"My own luck was being born white and middle-class into a house full of books, with a father who encouraged me to read and write" (Rich, 170).
Christina made the observation in her blog based on our class discussion that the word "choice" shouldn't actually be used when describing most women and whether they stay at home with their children or work. In the 50's most women were expected to stay at home; they were not given a choice. Career choices were limited to teachers, nurses, and secretaries. Most women never dreamed of going to college. In 2008 most women still are not even given a choice; however, the tables have turned. Today most women must work to make money and support themselves and their children. Most families in America rely on two incomes; mothers who aren't married are often forced to work not one but two jobs to make ends meet. Adrienne Rich makes a valid point in her essay "When We Dead Awaken." I, too, am lucky enough to be born white and middle-class. I was encouraged to read, write, and spend my childhood believing I could be anything in the world I wanted to be. I think it is safe to say that the majority of students here at Richmond have similar backgrounds and have similar opportunites. Even though I may be priviledged enough to eventually have a choice between staying home with my children or pursuing a powerhouse career, I recognize that, for most women, choice does not exist. Maybe choice shouldn't have been the topic of discussion in our Monday's class. Maybe the focus should have been on opportunity and circumstance.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
1 comment:
Why is it, do you think, that we don't talk about men having the choice or opportuniy to stay home with children?
Post a Comment